Web15 S v Takaendesa 1972 (4) SA 72 (RAD). 16 Amalgated Packaging Industries v Hutt 1975 (4) 943 (A). 17 Johannesburg City Council v Arumugan 1961 (3) SA 748 (W). WebHe relied on S v Chogugudza 1996 (1) ZLR 28 (S) where the following appears ... See Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes 12 ed at p 28, quoted by BEADLE CJ in S vTakaendesa 1972(4) SA 72 (RA) at 75 G; 1972(1) RLR 325(A) at 332 E-F. Section 3(1)(a)(ii) provides: "3. Corrupt Practices
Dismissed workers are entitled to retrenchment packages
WebIn S v. Takaendesa 1972 (1) RLR 162, Beadle CJ referred to “the elementary rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and cited, with approval, ... Thus, in S v. Masiriva 1990 (1) ZLR 373, where the court was called upon to interpret section 46(4) of the Road Traffic Act ... Webr"he Vagrancy Amendment Act, 51 of 1972, breathes new life into the old Chapter 49. The first breath is by way of additional defini· tions of "vagrant". The new definition in s.2(bl) reads "any person who is idle or disorderly". In practice it will probably be found that this definition is not very helpful. The law dictionaries are full of subaru outback liftgate won\u0027t open
1972 Canada-Soviet Hockey Series (Summit Series)
Weblegal status of rules of interpretation the rules of interpretation are not rules in the original sense of having binding force. the correct attitude which the In S v. Takaendesa 1972 (1) RLR 162, Beadle CJ referred to “the elementary rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and cited, with approval, the excerpt from Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes. The quotation adopted by the Chief Justice continues, “Where, by the use of clear and unequivocal language capable of only one meaning ... Web72 See R v Takaendesa 1972 4 SA 72 (RAD). 73 Caledonia (fn 24 above) 6. DEFINITION OF CORPORATE MERGERS IN ZIMBABWE’S COMPETITION ACT 601. ... 76 S v Makandigona 1981 4 SA 439 (ZAD) ... subaru outback limited 2020 review